|
|
Post by MikeyB on Apr 22, 2024 19:46:14 GMT -5
This shit writes itself.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hey Man on Apr 22, 2024 19:58:41 GMT -5
This is all very entertaining. Trump claims he wants to go on the stand. I hope he does.
|
|
|
|
Post by Psychocreature on Apr 23, 2024 1:36:35 GMT -5
Phony charges by liberal prosecutors brought on against him after the statute of limitations. This should get appealed.
The judge is dishonorable, because he refuses to recuse himself from the case, because his own daughter will be profiting from Trump's conviction.
|
|
|
|
Post by battra on Apr 23, 2024 8:08:43 GMT -5
Phony charges by liberal prosecutors brought on against him after the statute of limitations. This should get appealed. The judge is dishonorable, because he refuses to recuse himself from the case, because his own daughter will be profiting from Trump's conviction. 1. What did you see in the indictment that showed these are phony charges? 2. If this is past the statute of limitations, it would have already been thrown out. 3. Oh. I’m assuming then you felt that the entire conservative members of the court should have recused when cases brought by their financial benefactors came before the court? |
|
|
|
Post by battra on Apr 23, 2024 8:10:03 GMT -5
I notice PS regurgitates the same things Trump does.
Do you feel like you’re thinking when you do that or being led like a sheep?
|
|
|
|
Post by MikeyB on Apr 23, 2024 8:18:14 GMT -5
battraYou can't reason with a Trumper. Save your energy.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hey Man on Apr 23, 2024 11:35:30 GMT -5
Phony charges by liberal prosecutors brought on against him after the statute of limitations. This should get appealed. The judge is dishonorable, because he refuses to recuse himself from the case, because his own daughter will be profiting from Trump's conviction. Maybe there is a lesson learned here. As a married man running for POTUS, don't go around fucking porn stars. Then, shockingly, you don't have to pay them off. I have a hard time drumming up any sympathy for a guy running around on his wife dealing with consequences for running around on his wife. He fucked her and Cohen paid her off with a NDA. None of that on its own is criminal. Cohen using (allegedly) campaign funds to do it, that is illegal. It simply is. So at a bare minimum, Cohen committed a crime. Whether they can prove Trump knew about it, condoned it, ordered it, and/or tried to cover it up is the crux of the case. |
|
|
|
Post by Hey Man on Apr 23, 2024 11:36:54 GMT -5
battraYou can't reason with a Trumper. Save your energy. No one is really expecting to change anyone's mind here - the debate is fun nonetheless as we see this trial unfold. |
|
|
|
Post by Psychocreature on Apr 25, 2024 3:52:58 GMT -5
Phony charges by liberal prosecutors brought on against him after the statute of limitations. This should get appealed. The judge is dishonorable, because he refuses to recuse himself from the case, because his own daughter will be profiting from Trump's conviction. Maybe there is a lesson learned here. As a married man running for POTUS, don't go around fucking porn stars. Then, shockingly, you don't have to pay them off. I have a hard time drumming up any sympathy for a guy running around on his wife dealing with consequences for running around on his wife. He fucked her and Cohen paid her off with a NDA. None of that on its own is criminal. Cohen using (allegedly) campaign funds to do it, that is illegal. It simply is. So at a bare minimum, Cohen committed a crime. Whether they can prove Trump knew about it, condoned it, ordered it, and/or tried to cover it up is the crux of the case. If this was anyone else, there wouldn't be any charges. Liberals know that since Biden is behind Trump in the polls, convicting him on lame charges is the only way to stop him. Yeah I'm sure Trump made some bad decisions when it comes to women, but ya'll were ok with Bill Clinton's behavior. He also paid off tramps. |
|
|
|
Post by Hey Man on Apr 25, 2024 7:08:53 GMT -5
Maybe there is a lesson learned here. As a married man running for POTUS, don't go around fucking porn stars. Then, shockingly, you don't have to pay them off. I have a hard time drumming up any sympathy for a guy running around on his wife dealing with consequences for running around on his wife. He fucked her and Cohen paid her off with a NDA. None of that on its own is criminal. Cohen using (allegedly) campaign funds to do it, that is illegal. It simply is. So at a bare minimum, Cohen committed a crime. Whether they can prove Trump knew about it, condoned it, ordered it, and/or tried to cover it up is the crux of the case. If this was anyone else, there wouldn't be any charges. Liberals know that since Biden is behind Trump in the polls, convicting him on lame charges is the only way to stop him. Yeah I'm sure Trump made some bad decisions when it comes to women, but ya'll were ok with Bill Clinton's behavior. He also paid off tramps. Whataboutism. And yes, if they were paid off with campaign funds - that is illegal. Only Trump does stupid shit like this. |
|
|
|
Post by battra on Apr 25, 2024 7:54:26 GMT -5
Maybe there is a lesson learned here. As a married man running for POTUS, don't go around fucking porn stars. Then, shockingly, you don't have to pay them off. I have a hard time drumming up any sympathy for a guy running around on his wife dealing with consequences for running around on his wife. He fucked her and Cohen paid her off with a NDA. None of that on its own is criminal. Cohen using (allegedly) campaign funds to do it, that is illegal. It simply is. So at a bare minimum, Cohen committed a crime. Whether they can prove Trump knew about it, condoned it, ordered it, and/or tried to cover it up is the crux of the case. If this was anyone else, there wouldn't be any charges. Liberals know that since Biden is behind Trump in the polls, convicting him on lame charges is the only way to stop him. Yeah I'm sure Trump made some bad decisions when it comes to women, but ya'll were ok with Bill Clinton's behavior. He also paid off tramps. Liberals know these charges were filed before Trump announced his was running. |
|
|
|
Post by Hey Man on Apr 30, 2024 11:30:45 GMT -5
Based on the facts presented, Trump is going to lose this case, they have him. Unless of course there is the one juror that doesn't agree, but, it is pretty obvious from the testimony and evidence provided.
|
|
|
|
Post by Psychocreature on Apr 30, 2024 21:52:22 GMT -5
Based on the facts presented, Trump is going to lose this case, they have him. Unless of course there is the one juror that doesn't agree, but, it is pretty obvious from the testimony and evidence provided. Will it get appealed? |
|
|
|
Post by Hey Man on Apr 30, 2024 21:53:53 GMT -5
Based on the facts presented, Trump is going to lose this case, they have him. Unless of course there is the one juror that doesn't agree, but, it is pretty obvious from the testimony and evidence provided. Will it get appealed? Trump will always to appeal any loss in court. |
|
|
|
Post by Psychocreature on Apr 30, 2024 21:57:04 GMT -5
Trump will always to appeal any loss in court. hARD to win when 95% of the jurors are against you. |
|
|
|
Post by Hey Man on Apr 30, 2024 22:03:22 GMT -5
Trump will always to appeal any loss in court. hARD to win when 95% of the jurors are against you. He shouldn't win - they totally got him on this based on the facts presented so far. Pecker's testimony is the one that most damaging, because that one leads to intent. Also Trump's lawyers approved of the jurors. Any jurors that were obviously Trump haters were taken out. |
|
|
|
Post by Psychocreature on Apr 30, 2024 22:16:19 GMT -5
hARD to win when 95% of the jurors are against you. He shouldn't win - they totally got him on this based on the facts presented so far. Pecker's testimony is the one that most damaging, because that one leads to intent. Also Trump's lawyers approved of the jurors. Any jurors that were obviously Trump haters were taken out. They've already proven to be Trump haters based on their past social media posts. His lawyers only got to choose from the leftovers. Trump stated after they were chosen that 95% of them are libs. |
|
|
|
Post by Hey Man on Apr 30, 2024 22:23:32 GMT -5
He shouldn't win - they totally got him on this based on the facts presented so far. Pecker's testimony is the one that most damaging, because that one leads to intent. Also Trump's lawyers approved of the jurors. Any jurors that were obviously Trump haters were taken out. They've already proven to be Trump haters based on their past social media posts. His lawyers only got to choose from the leftovers. Trump stated after they were chosen that 95% of them are libs. I don't think you understand how jury's are picked. Trump's lawyers were fine to move forward with the jurors selected. They got rid of people who had social media posts, etc - shitting on Trump. |
|
|
|
Post by Psychocreature on Apr 30, 2024 22:32:15 GMT -5
They've already proven to be Trump haters based on their past social media posts. His lawyers only got to choose from the leftovers. Trump stated after they were chosen that 95% of them are libs. I don't think you understand how jury's are picked. Trump's lawyers were fine to move forward with the jurors selected. They got rid of people who had social media posts, etc - shitting on Trump. Actually I do understand because I've went through the process myself many years ago lol. Trump got 12% of the Manhattan vote. That would be like Biden going on trial in Robert's county in Texas. |
|
|
|
Post by Hey Man on Apr 30, 2024 22:36:00 GMT -5
I don't think you understand how jury's are picked. Trump's lawyers were fine to move forward with the jurors selected. They got rid of people who had social media posts, etc - shitting on Trump. Actually I do understand because I've went through the process myself many years ago lol. Trump got 12% of the Manhattan vote. That would be like Biden going on trial in Robert's county in Texas. Again, Trump's lawyers were satisfied. Also if it is proven that he is guilty, then what does it matter? I know you suck on Trump's cock, but perhaps you should consider that he is actually guilty of things and there isn't some big conspiracy. Trump is completely losing in court right now per the evidence so far. |
|
|
|
Post by Psychocreature on Apr 30, 2024 22:41:04 GMT -5
Bullshit charges only to interfere with an election that Biden is losing. Anyone else, this wouldn't have been brought to trial.
|
|
|
|
Post by Psychocreature on Apr 30, 2024 23:38:04 GMT -5
The judge is corrupt. His daughter works directly for Joe Biden.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hey Man on May 1, 2024 0:04:11 GMT -5
Bullshit charges only to interfere with an election that Biden is losing. Anyone else, this wouldn't have been brought to trial. They would be if they used campaign finances to pay off porn stars. There's the rub - politicians who cheat on their wives are not morons like Trump and wouldn't do that. |
|
|
|
Post by Hey Man on May 1, 2024 0:06:36 GMT -5
The judge is corrupt. His daughter works directly for Joe Biden. Can you make any more excuses? If Trump loses, then they can appeal and make such arguments - which would only result in a new trial, which would still prove that Trump is guilty per the evidence. |
|
